Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

No. 1 (2021)

What Sparkles Does Not Always Shine: A Study of Segregation and Gentrification in The Neighborhood of Runnymede-Bloor West Village as it Relates to the Wider City of Toronto

DOI
https://doi.org/10.25071/2564-4661.22
Submitted
May 24, 2021
Published
2021-09-26
Versions

Abstract

This paper is an ethnographic and sociological study of the neighborhood of Runnymede-Bloor West Village, identifying trends and drawing conclusions based on statistical data, academic theory, and notes taken during research trips. It is also worth noting that this study was conducted in January of 2020 before the Global pandemic was declared. Focusing on gentrification, segregation, and inequality, I identify that this neighborhood is part of a growing trend in Toronto of the increasing severity of all three of these issues. Runnymede-Bloor West Village is quickly becoming one of Toronto’s wealthiest neighborhoods, with the average household income increasing substantially. While this will certainly make real estate agents happy and will probably provide the city with more property tax, it also has the effect of pushing less affluent people out, as increasing living costs make their continued residence in Runnymede-Bloor West Village unaffordable. It also influences the local businesses, as businesses that do not cater to the new influx of affluent residents go out of business, either because their customer base has left or because they can no longer afford to pay their rent. I also identify the increased segregation of the neighborhood, as the racialized character of income inequality in Toronto results in people of color being priced out. Finally, I recommend that the solution to much of this increased inequality is the building of more affordable housing and restrictions of the building of unaffordable housing. Much of this will require the actions of a progressive, engaged local government. Hopefully, these steps will be able to halt or even reverse the trend of an ever-increasing cost of living, provide the local businesses with customers who do not have to spend most of their income on housing costs, and provide a short term solution to the issue of income and ethnicity-based segregation in Toronto.

References

  1. Costello, C. (2005). “The Asylum Procedures Directive and the Proliferation of Safe Country Practices: Deterrence, Deflection and the Dismantling of International Protection?” European Journal of Migration and Law 7: pp. 35-69.
  2. Del Bel Belluz, A. (2012). “An Investigation Of The Relationship Between A Designated Country Of Origin List And Access To Legal Aid In Ontario.” Theses and dissertations. Paper 1312. Ryerson University.
  3. EuroMed Rights, the European Association for the defence of Human Rights (AEDH), and the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH). (May 2016). “Safe” countries: A Denial of The Right of Asylum. Published jointly by EuroMed, AEDH and FIDH.
  4. Femke, V. (March 2021). “The Presumption of Safety Tested: The Use of Country of Origin Information in the National Designation of Safe Countries of Origin.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 40(1): pp. 106-137.
  5. Goodwin-Gill, G. S. (April 1992). “Safe Country? Says Who?” International Journal of Refugee Law 4 (2): pp. 248-250.
  6. Osgoode Hall Law School. (2017). Law Professors Call for Suspension of the Safe Third Country Agreement. Retrieved from: https://www.osgoode.yorku.ca/news/law-professors-call-suspension-safe-third-country-agreement/
  7. Pappé, I. (2013). The Forgotten Palestinians: A History of the Palestinians in Israel. Yale University Press.
  8. van Bruinessen, M. (1991). Agha, Shaikh and State: The Social and Political Structures of Kurdistan. Zed Books.
  9. Weiss, P. (April 1954). “The International Protection of Refugees.” American Journal of International Law 48(2): pp. 193-221.