Aller directement au menu principal Aller directement au contenu principal Aller au pied de page

Articles

No. 3 (2024): Contemporary Kanata: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Canadian Studies

Research with Indigenous Girls: A Review

DOI
https://doi.org/10.25071/2564-4661.77
Soumise
mai 6, 2025
Publié-e
2025-05-13 — Mis(e) à jour 2025-07-08
Versions

Résumé

This review explores decolonial research methodologies for engaging Indigenous adolescent girls, focusing on mitigating colonial legacies within research practices. Critically examines existing literature and highlights the imperative of centring Indigenous perspectives and knowledge production while decentering Western academic paradigms. This review underscores the importance of collaboration with participants by drawing on examples from participatory and land-based research methods, such as arts- based activities and photovoice. Further, there is the need for research to be reciprocal and beneficial to participants, fostering meaningful relationships and prioritizing authentic engagement. Barriers to participation, including paternalistic consent requirements, challenges in disseminating data, and strategies to address these obstacles are identifiable. While the review focuses on the experiences of Indigenous adolescent girls 13 to 18 years old, it also calls attention to the need for inclusive research practices that engage younger Indigenous children. The review offers insights into decolonial methodologies that prioritize Indigenous knowledge and empower participants, contributing to more ethical and equitable research practices.

Références

  1. Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC). (2016). Honouring the Strength of Our Sisters: Increasing Access to Human Rights Justice for Indigenous Women and Girls: https://www.chrcccdp.gc.ca/sites/default/files/roundtable_summary_report_eng_0.pdf
  2. Chadwick Anna. (2019). Imagining alternative spaces: Re-searching sexualized violence with Indigenous girls in Canada. Girlhood Studies, 12(3), 99-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2019.120309
  3. Clark, Natalie, Hunt, Sarah, Jules, Georgia, & Good, Trevor. (2010). Ethical dilemmas in community-based research: Working with vulnerable youth in rural communities. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8(4), 243-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-010-9123-y
  4. Hardy, Billie-Jo, Lesperance, Alexa, Foote, Iehente, Firestone, Michelle, & Smylie, Janet. (2020). Meeting Indigenous youth where they are at: Knowing and doing with 2SLGBTTQQIA and gender nonconforming Indigenous youth: a Qualitative case study. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09863-3
  5. McHugh, Tara-Leigh F., & Kowalski, Kent C. (2009). Lessons learned: Participatory action research with young Aboriginal women. Pimatisiwin, 7(1), 117-131.
  6. Shea, Jennifer M., Poudrier, Jennifer, Thomas, Roanne, Jeffery, Bonnie, & Kiskotagan, L.enore (2013). Reflections from a creative community-based participatory research project exploring health and body image with First Nations girls. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 272-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200113
  7. Tuck, Eve, & Yang, K. Wayne. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1(1), 1-40.
  8. Tuhiwai Smith, Linda. (2021). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350225282